Now that I have finished and tested all compression formats that you will see in version 1.2, I have, of course, prepared a little table for you comparing the speed and compression ratios.
I assembled a 42 MB folder with:
- 24.2 MB - an old Web project (PHP, HTML, Photoshop files, JPEGs, Flash)
- 10.4 MB - Subversion repository
- 3.9 MB - BetterZip.app (yes, it's a bit larger now)
- 3.5 MB - Various Word and PDF documents
- 0.6 MB - Excel spreadsheets (my income tax files, ugh!)
|
Saving (s) |
Extracting (s) |
Size (bytes) |
Ratio |
| Original |
- |
- |
40,772,817 |
100% |
| ZIP |
10 |
9 |
23,555,749 |
57.8% |
| TAR |
10 |
7 |
42,076,160 |
103.2% |
| TGZ |
13 |
7 |
23,040,000 |
56.5% |
| TBZ |
40 |
14 |
21,667,840 |
53.1% |
| RAR |
70 |
11 |
18,350,510 |
45.0% |
| RAR-High |
74 |
13 |
18,290,152 |
44.9% |
| 7-Zip-Low |
40 |
27 |
19,711,979 |
48.3% |
| 7-Zip |
54 |
29 |
17,513,607 |
43.0% |
| 7-Zip-High |
55 |
29 |
17,281,293 |
42.4% |
| SitX * |
30 |
28 |
20,975,408 |
51.4% |
ZIP and TGZ are very fast and are wide-spread, so everyone will be able to extract these formats on any platform without downloading extra software.
RAR has better (although the slowest) compression but is incredibly fast when decompressing.
However, I declare 7-Zip the winner. There was not a single test case during the development and testing phase where another format produced smaller archives. It has strong password encryption, can produce multi-volume archives, and the algorithms are open source and have been ported to many platforms.
Just in case you didn't know: TAR doesn't compress its contents. It just puts all the files into one big file for later compression with another program, e.g. GZip or BZip2 which in turn can only compress one single file. They're a perfect match.
Have a nice weekend and be sure to check out the new version on Tuesday!
*) BetterZip cannot create or extract SitX archives, but as requested I added the numbers anyway.